A few days ago, I wrote that there was no need to panic about AI and cybersecurity.
I still believe that.
But "do not panic" does not mean "do nothing". It certainly does not mean that organisations can keep doing exactly the same thing, at exactly the same speed, with exactly the same assumptions.
And one of those assumptions may be quietly dying in front of us: the idea that organisations have weeks to fix serious vulnerabilities before attackers can realistically exploit them at scale.
The Old Patching Rhythm
For many organisations, vulnerability management has historically been built around a fairly comfortable rhythm: scan, prioritise, assign, test, patch, report, chase, escalate, and eventually close.
That process was never perfect, but it was familiar. Critical vulnerabilities often had remediation SLAs measured in weeks. High vulnerabilities were sometimes given months. Only the truly urgent cases, the ones...
>>[READ MORE]

Patching Faster Than Your Shadow? AI and the New Vulnerability Race
Maybe AI won't kill us after all: a more balanced take on AI and CyberSecurity
Racing to AI: Don’t Forget the Rules of the Road
When Microsoft Turns Against You: Hackers Wipe Thousands of Devices
MAURITIUS SECURITY CLUB IS BACK - MU.SCL Season 3!
Cyber Security Governance resources from the UK Government